I have heard that...
because of the falling concrete and other structural problems that beset Wrigley Field last year, the Cubs have been requested, and have complied with said request, to sell fewer standing-room tickets this season.
This would explain why there have been only three announced crowds of over 40,000 this year, as compared to fourteen last year. In fact, looking at last year's game-by-game attendance record, there were no 40,000+ crowds in 2004 after game #49 -- the game of July 22, 2004, which was right around the time the falling-concrete story became public.
In connection with this, I have also heard rumors that eventually, the entire upper deck will have to be replaced as a result. This is actually a positive development -- it means that the Cubs have long-range plans to stay in Wrigley Field, and that in addition to the already-announced bleacher expansion proposal, that the Cubs could wind up adding more seats, skyboxes, etc. and stay in Wrigley Field for many years to come.
With a bit of a breather, I also wanted to give a couple of mini-reviews of two baseball/sports-related books I've read recently.
One of them you already know a bit about -- Rammer Jammer Yellow Hammer, about the lengths to which Alabama football fans go to follow their team, and which inspired me to write the "Why Are We Here" thread that's now on the right sidebar.
The title comes from, as the author explains, the title of a long-defunct 'Bama student publication ("Rammer Jammer") and the Alabama state bird.
Suffice to say this: it was well worth reading, because I recognized myself in so much of what Warren St. John wrote, and I think most of you will too. Being a fan of a team does, in fact, become in part, who you are, no matter whether it's Alabama football, or the Cubs. The feeling is universal, and St. John captures it well. The reason he does, of course, is that he's not just a New York writer doing this book -- he's doing the book because he grew up in Alabama loving the football team in the Bear Bryant era.
It chronicles one season -- the year is never identified, probably to make the book more timeless, but clues inside make it clear that it's the 1999 season. That's really not relevant, except for this fact -- I think any of us who are true fans of any sport, would try to figure this out, because... well, that's what we do. And that's kind of the point of the book.
Fun to read, great characters (you could NOT make these people up -- they have to be real!) and terrific stories. Highly recommended.
A couple of months ago, I also read Larceny & Old Leather, by Chicago-area attorney Eldon Ham. This book is kind of a wide-ranging summary of various types of "larceny", or cheating, in baseball history. It covers things like steroids, corked bats, spitballs, spying, betting, cheating of all kinds.
In trying to do all these things, I think the book bites off a little more than it can chew. I found it interesting, but a little unfocused, since it was trying to cover so many things. Ham is at his best when talking about the Pete Rose scandal. While I don't necessarily agree with his conclusions, it was the only part of the book where I felt Ham was putting passionate beliefs in something, rather than just reciting facts.
And that's another thing... the book could have stood proofreading and fact-checking. It was irritating to read, in the section on Sammy's corked-bat incident, that he had hit "twenty home runs in the first three weeks" of the 2003 season.
We could have only wished for that many!
Similarly, the book had Satchel Paige pitching for the "1965 Oakland Athletics" -- nope, they didn't move there from Kansas City till 1968 and has one-armed St. Louis Browns outfielder Pete Gray playing for the Browns in 1951, the same season the midget Eddie Gaedel batted for them (nope; Gray's one year for the Browns was 1945).
But these are nitpicks. Ham's book is well-written, and if you want a fun overview of what the cover calls the "mischievous legacy" of baseball, it's worth checking out.
Next on the reading list: Buzz Bissinger's "Three Nights In August", which is primarily focused on Cardinal manager Tony LaRussa's managerial ways, but is also of interest to Cub fans, because the "Three Nights" are the pennant-race-crucial series between the Cubs and Cardinals at Busch Stadium in late August, 2003.
And, for discussion of the Rafael Palmeiro steroid suspension, there's a diary on the right sidebar.
Enjoy the off day. Winning begins tomorrow.
0 recs | 41 comments
That was leather larceny . . .
a phrase used to describe a particularly good defensive play by Chip Caray that was among his most annoying atempts at a clever turn-of-phraseTom Mason - August 1, 2005
LEATHER LARCENY
I LOVE ITBillHoldenFan - August 1, 2005
Three Nights in August
Even though Bissenger went out of his way to deny it I thought the book seemed a lot like a direct reply to Moneyball. I really felt like even knowing I'm a Cubs fan it was too slanted towards telling the reader what to think about LaRussa rather than just telling stories and letting the reader decide for themself.I did however find the JD Drew stuff kind of amusing.
JonH - August 1, 2005
Also..
A new book about the Braves (SCOUT?) minor leagues is a rebuttal to the Moneyball approach to building a team.I read Moneyball and I could see why it POed a lot of folks in the business. Even a neutral observer can see that the success of the Braves and the Twins shows that there are more ways to skin a cat than the approach used by the A's. But the main point in Moneyball; which is to use Stats as a means to hedge decision making needs to be appreciated. Especially after the success of the A's this year after the horrendous start.
victor @ Bleed Cubbie Blue - August 2, 2005
Quote
Enjoy the off day. Winning begins tomorrow.The Cubs should be excited to play at Philadelphia. Their stadium is a homerun paradise.
Carlos - August 1, 2005
I know this isn't like me...
but I have to make a negative comment on this. The Cubs had a lot of home runs at Wrigley against them while they only hit like two. And the ball was carrying yesterday. But OTOH, maybe they were just trying to be nice hosts and let the other teams hit them :). I really want them to beat Philadelphia because if I remember correctly they were part of a week long losing streak. And it was at Wrigley so they better do something good.sparkles721 - August 1, 2005
Torii
Out for the season. Poor Twins, I'm sure they would love to have Korey now.Plus, rookie Zack Duke pitched into the ninth inning and earned his fourth victory in a Pittsburgh win over the hot Atlanta Braves. Gerut didn't debut for the Pirates.
Duke's ERA now stands at 0.92. Rookie of the year, anyone?
Carlos - August 1, 2005
yeah
i wasn't gettign the difference between "4-6 weeks" and "the season" when he went down to begin with. I know there's 8 weeks left but I think we learned with our guys youc an always add a couple weeks to rehab.mike bornemann @ Bleed Cubbie Blue - August 1, 2005
That's sad
I like Torii, and that is just horrible for the Twins. I watched Duke's game, and he is definitely amazing. Why didn't Hendry ask for Duke as throw in?? I'm sure the Pirates wouldn't have been against it...sparkles721 - August 1, 2005
Don't assume...
... that Patterson couldn't be traded now.I'm not sure what the rules are regarding players on the 40-man roster who are on optional assignment to the minors, as Patterson is.
25-man roster players have to clear waivers. Anyone know the rules on this? And don't assume that he wouldn't.
Al Yellon - August 1, 2005
clear waivers?
no way he clears waivers. he's making hardly anything (relatively speaking...) and has a huge upside. i just can't see him clearing waivers.if he's somehow exempt from that, i guess we could still trade him. but it wouldn't make a lot of sense at this point, to me.
billywan - August 1, 2005
I agree
with you on that he wouldn't clear waivers and that it doesn't make sense. Why would we trade him? He isn't hurting us anymore, the deadline is gone, and unless we get Manny Ramirez for him, there is no reason to. I used to think that even before the deadline Hendry would make a bad trade if he traded Corey because he probably wouldn't get equal value.If they really wanted to get rid of him, he would have already been gone.
sparkles721 - August 1, 2005
speaking of books...
I got a copy of the Ron Santo/Phil Pepe book Few And Chosen: Defining Cubs Greatness Across the Eras for my birthday. Halfway through it, it's great reading (if a little pricey).http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1572437103/qid=1122932243/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-3574 721-5428913?v=glance&s=books&n=507846
bison - August 1, 2005
Falling concrete
" falling concrete and other structural problems that beset Wrigley Field"Everthing is falling apart since Dusty took over.
jimhickman - August 1, 2005
i've got one!
gas prices are a lot higher since dusty took over! fire him!billywan - August 1, 2005
the concrete...
is bad all over. I took pictures last year of the underside of the lower deck. You could see years of evidence of years of tuckpointing and patching, as well as exposed, rusted rebar.This year, we got to sit in the dugout boxes near the visitors dugout. We were in there early, and I heard a sound like rocks hitting concrete. I looked and it was my kids (ages 4 & 5) "playing marbles." Except their marbles were chunks of old Wrigley Field concrete, roughly ranging in size from golf-ball to tennis ball. About 10 in all, unknown if they were off the upper deck or (more likely) remnants of the decaying lower deck.
We kept a big one as a souvenir, and gave the rest to a very surprised usher.
bison - August 1, 2005
The Wrigley Field upper deck
is going to have to be replaced soon. There's no way around it. The Tribune Company is just going to have to suck it up, rent out U.S. Cellular for a couple of seasons, tear down the upper deck, and erect a new one.That would also be as good a time as any to do the other projects around the ballpark that they've talked about doing: Expanding the bleachers; building the Cubs Museum / parking garage / team offices next door; constructing the promenade between the new building and the ballpark, etc.
Gregory - August 1, 2005
We discussed...
... the upper deck thing during Sunday's game.We figure it could be done in sections, and during off-seasons. Or, depending on how quickly they wanted to do it, maybe in one off-season.
Wrigley Field was built in a little less than two months in 1914.
Al Yellon - August 2, 2005
U of I had to do it...
in 1991-92. They redid both upper decks and the back part of the lower decks completely from November-August.To re-do the whole Wrigley upper deck from November-mid April (assuming an extended road trip to start the season) seems like a lot to ask.
bison - August 2, 2005
It could be...
... but it's also a smaller structure than Memorial Stadium in Champaign.Maybe half of it could be done at a time. I dunno. I doubt the Cubs would want to play at the Cell for a year.
Al Yellon - August 2, 2005
It is going to happen sooner
rather than later. I think that after the Bkleacher expansion and the building of the oofices/parking; the Cubs are going to tear down the upper deck and reconfigure and rebuild it.Isn't the facade already designated as a landmark? If so, the cubs will have to gut the inside and rebuild the whole thing, not just the upper deck. My only hope is that if the facade has to be kept the design does not become like the Soldier field monstrosity.
victor @ Bleed Cubbie Blue - August 2, 2005
In fact...
... parts of the outer facade are definitely replaceable -- the ugly concrete panels on the Addison Street side date from the 1950's and I know the Cubs would like to change those, and I don't think anyone would object too much.I also don't think replacing the upper deck would mean gutting the inside of the park. But it could mean more skyboxes, which is where bigtime revenue really originates.
Al Yellon - August 2, 2005
I'd love to see those Addison concrete slabs go
In fact, I'd like to see the architects come up with a good solution to the sidewalk bottleneck on Addison. On game days, with the Addison buses on one side and the slabs on the side of the ballpark jutting out on the other, getting through that sidewalk is like trying to get on a Tokyo commuter train. It's an incredibly claustrophobic feeling.Gregory - August 3, 2005
You're talking about...
... the twenty or so feet where the ballpark narrows the sidewalk to probably eight feet wide or less. I have no idea what they could do about that -- you can't narrow the street any, nor can you adjust the size of the ballpark.But yes, that's a problem.
Al Yellon - August 3, 2005
they could be creative
Double-deck the sidewalk or something. I dunno; I'm not an architect. But that aspect of the ballpark's exterior is a major inconvenience.Gregory - August 4, 2005
Wrigley has a smaller capacity, but....
each of the balconies at U of I holds 10,000. The upper deck at Wrigley surely holds at least that many. They worked on both sides of U of I at once and it wasn't sorrounded by buildings and busy city streets. They had virtually unlimited room for staging materials and equipment. A much easier job.If they were going to shut Wrigley down for a season, they'd surely do a complete gut rehab job like Soldier Field. That was January - following October.
We'll see.
bison - August 2, 2005
Pirate fans
Been looking over the blogs for the Pirates that Al has listed. They don't seem too happy about the Lawton trade. Not so much that they wanted Lawton to stay, but rather that they don't think Jody Gerut is worth much. They're also mad that the Pirates sent us cash, instead of the other way around.There is some griping about the Pirates being the Cubs AAAA franchise, but not a lot. And unlike on the Reds boards, there doesn't seem to be a lot of anger against the Cubs--it's more directed towards Pirates management and ownership.
I don't know if Pirate fans are simply level-headed and rational or that they've just been beaten into a sense of learned helplessness. One suspects both.
Anyway, I hope Gerut does well for them (except against the Cubs, of course). Not only do I want Gerut to succeed for his own sake, but the Pirates getting something out of this deal might help ensure that they keep sending us players like Aramis and Lawton.
Josh Timmers - August 1, 2005
The Pirates...
... will be at Wrigley Field Sept. 27 and 28, for the final two regular season home games.Let's hope those games are meaningful ones.
Al Yellon - August 1, 2005
Not necessarily....
maybe there has been a total collapse of everyone else and we have a 15 game lead in the WC by then! I'm aiming high, but I wouldn't bet on it. So I guess i do hope they are meaningful.sparkles721 - August 1, 2005
i don't get it
why would there be anger towards the cubs on reds sites? are they upset with all the outfielders we did not take off their hands?dc60123 @ Bleed Cubbie Blue - August 1, 2005
I also don't get it
I confess that I don't look at a lot of Reds sites regularly, but I'm a little baffled as to why they'd hold any animosity towards the Cubs. The Reds may be have-nots and the Cubs may be haves, but the Cubs have not had nearly as much success in this division in recent years as have the Cardinals and the Astros. You'd think that that's where Reds fans would direct their ire.Then again, perhaps it's a fan-invasion thing. I don't know how many Cards or Astros fans show up at the Great American Ballpark when their respective teams are in Cincinnati, but it's patently obvious that Cubs fans have been invading the GAB en masse in recent years. That's got to stick in the craw of Reds fans, who are a very proud bunch that take great pride in Cincy being a "baseball town".
Gregory - August 1, 2005
Red Reporter
You can go back and look at the Red Reporter site from when we played them earlier in the season and their "Why we hate the Cubs" thread. There's a lot of talk about "Cub arrogance" and such, but I think you hit it right on the head--it's a fan invasion thing. No one likes it when your home games seem like road games. I'm pretty sure there aren't lots of Astro fans showing up at GAB. Cardinal fans? Don't know. Maybe they hate the Cardinals too. You can hat more than one team.Josh Timmers - August 2, 2005
hmm...
"And unlike on the Reds boards, there doesn't seem to be a lot of anger against the Cubs--it's more directed towards Pirates management and ownership."I never knew Hendry had that kind of pull, that's kind of interesting.
priorpwnz - August 1, 2005
Question, Al.
I'm sure you have explained this many times in the past but you have referred to your seats as Season Tickets in the Bleachers. When did you purchase these? I had no idea these were ever available. How many season ticket holders are there in the bleachers. When did they stop offering these? Do you expect them to continue to offer these to you? I am a season ticket holder in section 233 and am just real curious to this arrangement. Thanks.SonnyJ9 - August 1, 2005
Here's the deal...
... bleacher season tickets were first offered in 1992, after a few of us (myself included) who were longtime regulars out there (I've been sitting there regularly since 1974) persuaded the Cubs to offer them.Unlike other seats which used to be offered on a part-season basis (you can't get the partial packages any more, but those who had them were allowed to keep them), bleacher season tickets have always been full-season only.
There have been between 50 and 100 or so season-ticket holders in the 14 seasons they've had them -- it dropped off after the strike in 1994, went back up after 1998. This shouldn't surprise you.
They stopped offering new bleacher season tickets after 2003. I believe there are around 80-100 at this time. They have told us that we can keep our season tickets indefinitely, though there will be no new ones sold.
Al Yellon - August 2, 2005
Patterson & Waivers
When Patterson got sent down, the waivers he cleared are the same waivers you have to clear to be traded in August. I speculate that this is a once-a-season thing (meaning he can still be traded) but I don't know that for sure.goldstj2 - August 1, 2005
I though Korey
Still had options left. Options are counted as full years of MLB service. He hasn't reached three.Carlos - August 1, 2005
Options...
... aren't the "number" of options, they are the number of years.Corey had to clear waivers, because he HAS reached three full years of ML service. 2003 counts because he was on the major league DL.
Al Yellon - August 2, 2005
Okay, I see
I know that options are full major league service years; though the year that confused me was 2003, I thought he wasn't placed in the major league DL. Why? I don't know. Maybe he could have been optioned and then placed on the Des Moines DL, but I'm sure they thought they would never send him down again.Anyway, I've been studying waivers since the beginning of the season. I should be an expert now, but they are just too fucking messy.
Carlos - August 2, 2005
I believe
that it's a new waiver period starting August 1. Players on the 40-man roster have to be resubmitted to clear waivers. IIRC, this waiver period lasts until November 1.Gregory - August 1, 2005
Here is...
... a useful site that explains some of this:Rob Neyer's Transactions Primer
Al Yellon - August 2, 2005
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Bleed Cubbie Blue to post a comment.