SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Bleed Cubbie Blue

Half-Baked




(as always, click on photo to view full-size in new browser window; if you are using IE, you may have to click the lower-right corner of the image to expand it to its full size; in Firefox click anywhere on the image. Photo by Al)

This one's for those of you who have been calling for Dusty Baker's head.

First of all, I thought the guy went to a lot of trouble to have this sign professionally made, and he was sitting in the section right next to us. And we all thought the sign was pretty funny.

But really -- can you blame Baker for last night's 9-4 loss to the Reds, the sixth Cub loss in a row?

You can't, nope, not this one, anyway. He used the lineup many of us have been screaming for -- Matt Murton in left, Matt Lawton in right, Jeromy Burnitz in center. Nomar has returned; Lawton's leading off.

And they didn't produce. And Jerome Williams kept getting slammed for extra-base hits. Frankly, the Cubs looked like they'd rather have been anywhere but in Wrigley Field on what was yet another humid day that turned into a pleasant night when the wind started blowing off the lake -- although it was announced that the wind was "north", it was clearly blowing from behind us, in from right field.

That didn't stop Adam Dunn or Ken Griffey Jr., both of whom deposited opposite-field home runs into the basket in left field. By the time Griffey hit his three-run shot that iced the game, Williams had given way to Glendon Rusch, although two of those three runs were charged to Williams.

And someone explain to me how three weeks after the Cubs hit five home runs off Brandon Claussen in Cincinnati, he comes to Chicago and holds the ballclub -- which has added a hitter -- to two harmless hits in seven innings.

The Cubs did draw five of those base-clogging walks, including three leading off innings, but nothing came of any of them -- Burnitz helped out by hitting into a double play right after Michael Barrett led off the second inning by walking.

Not a single bit of this is Dusty Baker's fault.

No, seriously -- despite the sign, what manager could have changed the apparent attitude of the Cub players last night?

Mike said that he hasn't seen a corpse yet, but it's getting close. That reminded me of this Monty Python sketch, in which there is the following exchange:

Klaus: Is it dead?
Mother: Well, it was coughin' up blood last night.
We do this all the time, in some of the worst British accents you've ever heard -- some Python sketch or another comes to mind, and the words spill out of me, Mike, Howard, or Jeff.

Speaking of Jeff, I had called him in the afternoon for another reason to learn that he had to "do some stuff" and wouldn't be coming. Dave (who arrived in the second inning, saying it had taken him 2 1/2 hours to drive in from the near western suburbs, and told us, "This is why I don't come to night games") asked where he was, and when I told him, said, "Tell me he's not at home watching the Bears exhibition game!"

Sure enough, I called him and that's exactly wht he was doing. I put Dave on the phone, where he proceeded to tease Jeff unmercifully about blowing off a nice night at the ballpark to watch an exhibition game. This provided much-needed levity. To be fair, Jeff had told me he did have things he needed to do last night, which allowed Brian to get to the game. We were also joined by Mark and Mark's friend Jacob, who spent BP as usual, huddled next to the front row trying to get one of the Reds to throw them a baseball. During this time the crowd tried to get Adam Dunn to flip a ball up; his response was to throw it over everyone's head onto Sheffield.

When Reds reliever Jason Standridge finally did throw a ball up to the stands, a tall man behind the two kids reached up and grabbed it. He was quickly booed down, and gave the ball "to the kid!" -- to Jacob.

This was, in fact, just about all the booing I heard, except when Baker came out to pull Williams. It was hard to tell whether the booing was for Baker or for Williams, but to me it was clearly justified at the time, even though the score was "only" 5-0 and had Rusch not given up the homer to Griffey, the four-run rally in the ninth (off Randy Keisler, of whom Dave said after watching him throw about four pitches: "If this is all he has, the Cubs are going to rack him," and they did) might have meant something.

As it was, we mostly just sat there marveling at a team that had scored one run in their previous 27 innings, suddenly smashing line singles all over the place. They were two more hits away from bringing the tying run to the plate, but Aramis Ramirez ended it with a sharp forceout grounder to third.

Finally, it was 70's Night, with the 7th Inning Stretch sung by Jimmie Walker, who Mike called "perhaps the least talented person ever to be on television" -- I had to disagree with that, although he's got to be in the top ten. This day always brings out people dressed in ridiculous-looking Afro wigs (in fact, you can see a couple of them on the left in the photo at the top of this post), and the worst polyester clothes you could imagine. It also brought someone dressed in a gorilla suit -- I couldn't quite figure that out.

Meanwhile, Howard, Jon and Jon's brother Marc, who is visiting from California, went to the Brewers game in Milwaukee -- Marc's a big Brewers fan. That must have been the reason that Mark Grudzielanek had five RBI last night.

Finally, it appears that Corey Patterson is going to be recalled from Iowa today and if so, I'd expect him to be in the starting lineup. The above-linked article doesn't say who's being demoted, but I would suspect it would be Matt Murton, whose playing time would be drastically reduced with Patterson on the roster.

I'm not saying anything, but the last time the Cubs dipped to four games under .500 and looked pathetic doing it, a roster move (the Murton/Greenberg recall) sent them on a 8-1 run.

I hate losing. Let's see a win today. There'll be a game thread up in a couple of hours.

0 recs  |  18 comments

Comments

Al
I think you're trying to have it both ways.  If you claim that it was Riggleman's fault when his Cubs team quit on him, you can't claim it's not Baker's fault when his Cubs team throws in the towel.  So which is it?
Thunderclap is right.
if the manager cant get his team up for a game, then it has to be the managers fault. this manager has made it clear that nothing will ever happen to a veteran that doesnt play hard, in his mind, the player knows whats best for the player.
it's over due for a change on the northside. with dusty, we're doomed.
Absolutely
Well said. The attitude of the team is the manager's responsibility.  They don't respond to Dusty because there are no consequences for poor play.
Your point...
... is well taken. However, I think we have to watch the last fifty games till we determine whether this has, in fact, happened.

The Cubs were 50-62 after 112 games in 1999, only four games worse than today.

They finished 67-95, so they went 17-33 after that, which is pretty awful.

I think this team is better than that. We shall see.

In any case you cannot blame Baker for last night's game -- he started the lineup all of us wanted to see.

This team is
better than the 99 squad and it is as healthy as it has been all year. If this team doesn't go close to 30-20 in the last 50 games, IMO they have quit on Baker.
I would agree....
... especially since it has been a hallmark of all Baker-led teams, that they play well in September.

Last year's team was 16-11 in September -- and 15-8 before the meltdown that ended the month.

(1-2 in October, so 17-13 after Sept. 1)

Just a note
Baker sacrificed when down several runs again last night. I've pretty much lost the ability to get upset at him. He just isn't a smart baseball guy. Expecting him to be one is folly.

In NY last weekend with Piazza catching all three games Baker did not call for one attempted SB (you can't count Maddux taking off on his own). Everyone knows Piazza can't move or throw well. He's thrown out under 13% of the runners this year! Every team, and I mean every team, runs on Piazza at will and the Cubs don't attempt on steal all weekend. At this point the season is becoming comical.

Hey Clap
how many runners were on with the opportunity to steal?  Not many from my viewing.  Your reaching with that one.
Agreed
It wasn't like they had a ton of opportunities, but by my recollection/count there was at least 5 opportunities (prior to any of the games getting out of hand) to attempt a steal. At least two of those ended up in DPs. Also they didn't hit & run either. Piazza a great guy to hit & run against because you don't really have to concern yourself with a guy swinging through a strike. This may have not been a hugh issue over last weekend due to the terrible lack of hitting, but it's the little things that sometimes make the difference between Ws and Ls.
I do agree
to a large extent, but those games weren't winnable at all.  We were pathetic offensively and we were playing from behind all the time.  It makes starting runners all the more difficult when you need any runner on to score.

I'm thinking this season is the epitome of Murphy's Law.

Huh???
The Cubs lost one game in NY 2-0. I'd surely consider that one winable.
maybe
but my recollection is we didn't get 1 hit from the 1-5 hitters.  So who was on the was going to steal or hit and run?  I don't remember the opportunity in that one.
not the lineup i wanted
Al do you really want a .400 hitter batting 8th? most of the time baker makes it a point to have murton bat 8th with the pitcher following. he's setting the kid up for failure. i have to give credit to the kid, he's still taking walks and getting hits. this kid looks like a #2 hitter to me.
2 HRs a Bad Thing?
I hate to continue being so pessimistic, but it's tough to be positive with the effort from this team.  Looks like Korey will be back and I hope he has his act together.  However I think his two homeruns last night is actually a bad thing.  My worry is that this will reinforce his notion that he's a homerun hitter.  His swing is already long enough.  The Cubs need him to put the ball in play and get on base, not swing for the fences and strike out 2-3 times a game.  
The final 50 or so games should be his last chance to prove he deserves to wear a Cub uniform. It is a privelage after all, something I don't think many on this team realize.
Well....
Right now the cubs need a hitter.  If he hit two home runs today, I think I would take it considering there has been no home runs hit and not a lot of offense.  But I would rather see him hit for doubles and maybe some homers with people on base.
Maybe he is a homerun hitter
I don't think his long swing is necessarily the whole problem, he had the same swing in 2003.  The problem with Corey, is that he seems to have no clue what pitchers are trying to do to him.  

If they are not going to give him a pitch to hit, then he should take 4 balls and go to first base and wreak some havoc.  After he starts to be more selective at the plate pitichers will start to give into him more.  We forget that Corey can actually hit, he just has yet to adjust, maybe being sent down gave him a wakeup call that he has to put in a little extra effort.  I'm not talking about BP, I'm talking about maybe studying some game tape and noticing that pitchers are throwing him face high fastballs and he is just giving in every time.  I have faith Corey can become a student of the game, if not I wish him luck in Japan.

A shorter swing
will help him take pitches.  With such a long swing he has to make up his mind to swing much earlier.  A shorter, more compact swing will give him more time to see the pitch before he needs to make a decision to swing.
We've all seen Patterson take those home run hacks which usually lead to a strikeout or a pop up to the second baseman.  
And as much as this offense could use a few home runs, the long term solution for Patterson is a line drive/ground ball producing swing.
That's part of what
he was working on in Iowa. Pat Listach had Patterson hold his hands lower at the plate, the reasoning being that it'll get them through the strike zone quicker and thus cut down on his swing. He also had Patterson using a broader stance, lessening the chance for inside pitches to tie him up. Derrek Lee also went to a broader stance this season. Sure worked for him.

Watch over the next few games in terms of whether or not Patterson is actually changing his approach.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Bleed Cubbie Blue to post a comment.