SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Bleed Cubbie Blue

Mistakes Were Made

When I make mistakes here -- and I do, every now and then -- I'm usually fairly quickly corrected by a sharp-eyed BCB reader or three, and I'll acknowledge the mistake, fix it and move on.

I'm kind of bored this morning with no Cubs game till tomorrow night, so I thought I'd take this opportunity to point out an error made by AP writer Dave Skretta in this recap of the Yankees' 3-2 win over the Royals on Saturday. In the notes paragraph at the bottom of the recap, he writes:

Yankees INF Cody Ransom made his big league debut in the seventh, pinch-running for [Jason] Giambi.

Cody Ransom is 32 years old and has bounced around the minor leagues since 1998, mostly in the Giants' organization. He played in the majors for Dusty Baker with the Giants in September callups in 2001 and 2002 and Dusty remembered him well enough to have the Cubs sign him to a minor league deal and invite him to spring training in 2005, where he hit .160 in 17 games (4-for-25, 2 doubles, a HR) and spent about half that year at Iowa.

Before he made his first appearance for the Yankees on Saturday he had played in 133 major league games.

Now, I remembered seeing Ransom in spring training in '05 and knew he had played for the Giants. But even if I hadn't, looking up the above information took about five minutes. Maybe I'm being nitpicky, but then again, I'm not being paid by the Associated Press to write game recaps. Dave Skretta should have done just a bit of research -- and especially when you consider that in the AP recaps posted at Yahoo, player names are linked to their profiles, meaning anyone could click on Ransom's name in the Yahoo recap and see that Saturday wasn't his ML debut.

Incidentally, Ransom celebrated his recall to the Yankees yesterday; he was sent up to bat for Giambi in the 7th inning with the Yankees leading 12-3 and hit a two-run homer off Jeff Fulchino.

0 recs  |  313 comments

Comments

Al, reading the Saturday's game recap

I think you made a mistake when you wrote that Jim Edmonds had a hit in the 7th. I think Reed Johnson pitch-hit for him because Arthur Rhodes was coming in. I know it’s little, but I’m a detail kind of guy.

You're right.

Did I write that? I knew Johnson had hit for Edmonds, who was hitting for the pitcher.

I'm not surprised at something like this.

It seems like with the addition of several media outlets including blogs, writers don’t seem to feel the need to be as accurate as possible. Maybe it was an honest mistake, but it seems like if you are producing material for a wire service, you should be as accurate as possible. If it was just lazy-assed reporting, then shame on him. The profession deserves a better effort.

Oh sure, Ransom has played in the majors before...

…but you haven’t played in the BIG leagues until you’ve played in YANKEE STADIUM.

Mistakes are overrated,

I’ve made a ton of them!

On another note, yesterday Pat Hughes was talking about he cubs wins in one run games and two run games, throwing a little caution in the wind. Does anyone have those? The numbers did not bode well for close games in the playoffs and I was a little surprised.

Make no mistake about this, it is fun being a cub fan right now!

Are they really overrated? Would you tend

to trust a story from a writer who constantly makes mistakes in his reporting? I agree that there doesn’t seem to be the attention called to mistakes as there once was. Reading some articles is apparent that there isn’t the importance to proofreading as ther once was, but a wire service article or a column in a major city paper are not responses to a blog post. They should be accurate and it’s the writes job to research the facts.

Sorry. Hope this isn't taken as snarky

but I was laughing hard reading this.

apparent that there isn’t the importance to proofreading as ther once was

sic. :)

Maybe you were trying to do this as a joke?
it’s the writes job to research the facts.
Cubs are 17-18 in 1 run games

will have to do check the scores individually to get the 2 run games…

Looks like 11-13 in 2 run games

if I didn’t miss any.

That is because the only way to beat the Cubs

Is by one run or two. It’s not like they get blown out very often.

I think this is more unnecessary hand wringing.

It might pay to check those

numbers agaist recent WS winners. I suspect most good teams would win slightly over half of thier 0ne and two run margin games. Those games tend to go either way based on breaks the fact that most of those games tend to be against better competition.

Just for grins

The TB Rays are 23-13 in 1 run games but only 19-16 in 5+ run games, so I guess it’s 6 of one, half dozen of another. WIns are wins.

And...

… the Rays had two of the former (one-run wins) and one of the latter (a five-run win) over the Cubs.

FYI the Cubs are 25-11 in games decided by 5+ runs

So, we may not have a GREAT record in close games, but in all others, we rock! We’ll see what the numbers are in 1 and 2 run games are at the end of the season. We’ll probably be pretty close to .500 when it’s all said and done.

and how many of those games were 1-run games until we blew it open?
Wow, I would have to look at each boxscore to filter that

give me some time to work on that. Have to squeeze in some actual work here at work today, so don’t know when I’ll get to that LOL

Just going back

and looking at the box scores on some of the early season blowouts, most of our blowout wins were well in hand early in the game. Of the first 11 blowout wins, we were only one run up or actually behind in 3 of them in the 6th or 7th inning. The other 8, we were 5 or more up by the 4th or 5th.

Of the first 4 blow out losses, the opposition was ahead by 5+ by the 5th, on average. There are 36 individual games to look at, and I really don’t have the time to document them all. Head over to HERE to view each game.

This is strange timing

I was at the I-Cubs game on Friday night and in the sky box area there are a bunch of pictures of former I-Cubs…pretty impressive list….well there was one of Cody Ransom..for the life of me I couldn’t remember who he was…..well now I do…

thanks

forget about a reporter who does not do his research I could care less

First thing most reporters are not sports fans or former athletes, they are writers and don’t really know the games they cover.

Is it they don't know the

games or are some just a bit lazy? Maybe they figure the casual fan doesn’t know when they read innacurate information or they don’t care. I know I would have a hard time witing stories on a regular basis if I felt that the readers aren’t paying much attention to what I write.

That's not an excuse.

If you’re going to put facts in your articles, you should check to make sure the facts are correct.

(Joking) But Facts Get In the Way of Good Stories

(Joking) Find out the conclusion you want and manufacture facts to support your claim. Accuracy doesn’t matter. (Again, joking)

You may be joking, but you aren't too far from the truth.
and that is the viewpoint

it is not the facts that matter, it is the storyline…the drama, the irony, their interest, the angle, the dea that the reader is easily amused and not interested in the real story.

If facts don't matter, don't include them.
I gotta disagree with this.

It seems to me that most sports reporters are, indeed, huge sports fans – that’s why they pursued that career path in the first place. And even if a reporter isn’t a sports fan, he or she should still know the games in question. Would a reporter sent to cover the war in Iraq not be expected to be familar with the history and current events in that region?

And if not...

… I’d think it’d be that reporter’s job to do enough research so that they DO know those things, no matter what the topic.

I think it shows a complete lack

of professionalism when a so-called sports reporter doesn’t know about a particular sport he or she is reporting. You are in the sports business, you should know what the hell you are talking about. If you don’t know, find out. With the internet, information is right at your fingertips. I don’t care if it’s pro football or cricket. If I as a casual sports fan know more about a subject than the person reporting, it wrong!

Exactly.

In this case, Skretta’s error was particularly egregious because it was so easily avoided. Does this guy have an e-mail address? Someone should send him a link to this thread – it might ruin his day, but it could save his job.

The sad part about it is

that I don’t even think his editor would take him task for this. There really doesn’t seem to be a lot of outcry about stuff like this. No one seems accountable. I had heard that news outlets had fact checkers to catch things like this, but I haven’t seen much evidence that they exist.

Sullivan used to get one fact wrong per game

He seems to have gotten a bit better.

Paul Sullivan? Don't get me started on that hack!
Sullivan's OK...

… but the point above is relevant. Isn’t that part of the editor’s job? To fact-check? Or to hire someone for that job?

The reporter is supposed to check any facts included in their story

but NOTHING that is factually incorrect should get by the editor…They are the last line of defense. It is understood that reporters are on deadline and often working more than one story, and t the editor is supposed to catch the little mistakes…

With cutbacks everywhere

sometimes there is NOBODY to proof somebody’s copy. When reporters are working on very tight deadlines, sometimes they forget to check facts.
That’s no excuse, but without other layers of people to edit — these days, stuff is going to leak through. The media has been stripped to the bone in many ways.

When I am a one-person radio news department on weekednds, I try to double-check my work before it airs. However, mistakes happen when writing quickly. I’ve caught and corrected them ASAP.

Just sayin….

Especially hard to catch

stuff when it’s your own, and your eyes are doing the checking…Many brain farts…

Sorry!

I did say “a bit”, tho…

How much research does it take?

That reporter could have:
1. Looked on the Internet (Baseball Reference, MLB.com, etc.)
2. Read the Yankees’ press notes for Saturday, p. 8.
3. Asked the Yankees’ PR director
4. Asked any media member who regularly covers baseball and remembered the error Ransom committed in the playoffs for the Giants
5. Gone into the clubhouse and asked Ransom

Not a huge amount of effort required.

really?
When I make mistakes here — and I do, every now and then — I’m usually fairly quickly corrected by a sharp-eyed BCB reader or three, and I’ll acknowledge the mistake, fix it and move on.

Really? Because the Lee/Aram bases loaded thing hasn’t been fixed.

I don't know if you are being serious or

needling Al, but he really isn’t the issue here. Reporters and columnist are being paid good money to do their jobs. Al is running a blog. There is a difference. Part of reporting and writing columns is being accurate. If I can’t trust the validity of the facts in a story, it’s not worth the paper on which it’s being printed.

You seem to only show up here when you're correcting me...

… but didn’t we go over this yesterday?

I think it’s time for this:

heh...

I just thought it was funny that you are talking about correcting your mistakes when you didn’t correct yesterday’s. :)

I think we knew you were making a joke at Al's expense, and believe me I am all for that,

I think that maybe this subject does warrant some serious discussion.

my old coaching friend will like this I have to save it to my desktop

he used to beat dead horse more than a politician

Just in case he'd rather have the classic look...

That one is much classier.
That's the one I prefer.

Lowitzki, Ramirez is a better hitter right now, and has been since April. That’s why they shouldn’t have walked Lee. Get over it.

I agree...

… not sure what your point is.

I never say that they should have walked Lee.

Epic

That made my day, on a day when two weeks of work got ruined.

Maybe he had Joe Morgan do his fact checking

the AP writer Dave Skretta, not Al!!!

I'd like to give a thumbs down to Dave Skretta
Facts

Facts are simple and facts are straight
Facts are lazy and facts are late
Facts all come with points of view
Facts don’t do what I want them to
Facts just twist the truth around
Facts are living turned inside out
Facts are getting the best of them
Facts are nothing on the face of things
Facts don’t stain the furniture
Facts go out and slam the door
Facts are written all over your face
Facts continue to change their shape

No point, I just like getting a Talking Heads reference in there now and again. :)

This has inspired me to create a signature line.
I'm still waiting.... I'm still waiting....
I still think "Lost my shape, trying to act casual/Can't stop, I might end up in the hospital"

Is one of the most bizarre opening lines to a song ever….lol

I think this post is inappropriate

First, you’re reading that sentence with an awfully narrow interpretation. It’s possible, and maybe even likely, that the reporter was referring to a big league debut for the YANKEES. Perhaps he should have been clearer but, in my opinion, you’re nitpicking like crazy.

Second, you too have made mistakes, Al, and you readily admitted that in your post. But you are attacking this writer’s credibility based on a mistake which could easily just be one of omission of three words, rather than a factual error. I expect, based upon your response to posts at Desipio in the past, that you would be pretty upset if they went through random posts of yours and called you out for your tiny mistakes with articles on their website, in front of the community that you write for. I get the AP/Blog distinction, but how is that any different?

It said "big league debut".

I don’t think there can be any different interpretation of that. If he had wanted to say “Yankee debut” he should have said “Yankee debut”.

Yes, it’s nitpicking. I said I was bored today.

Didn't Confucious say

“those who pick nits always lose”? LOL

Just trying to lighten the mood...

;)

fair enough

I just think this was a bit beyond the scope of this website and somewhat inappropriate, especially given your response to people who correct you.

Disagree.

Al’s post is both Cubs- and baseball-related. How is it “beyond the scope of this website”? And it’s a time-honored tradition for bloggers to take the mainstream media to task for its laziness and inaccuracy.

you're probably right

about the scope thing. If I could edit that I would…

I still think that the response of Al and people on this website when people correct him is notably different than it is when he does something like this. That’s more what I’m referring to.

By the way, I love FJM and have been linking to them on this site for probably a year and a half. So I do agree about the bloggers/MSM comment.

OK, well...

…seems to me that, when someone graciously points out a mistake in one of Al’s recaps, he’s more than willing to correct it. Disputes over matters of opinion are less easily resolved, but that’s par for the course on any blog.

+1

Basically it’s Al site and he decides what’s appropriate. Then it’s up to us to decide if we want to read it. If he continually gets too far off topic then he’ll lose readers.

it's Al's blog

as long as it’s about baseball, how can it be inappropriate?

sigh - let me clarify

As I said, if I could remove the scope comment I would. I know it’s Al’s blog, and I often say the same thing to myself when people complain about the content of some posts.

In any case, I think that it’s inappropriate to correct a very small mistake that might not even be one, as i said in my first post. I think that it’s inappropriate because Al doesn’t take especially kindly to outside media outlets (specifically Desipio) calling him out, and yet he thinks it’s appropriate to do just that here.

semantics

I think you can think it’s wrong.

But it’s Al’s blog. If he deems it appropriate, it cannot, by definition, be inappropriate.

in addition... some posts from yesterday's recap:

These are all in response to Big_Lowitzki’s correction of Al.

“Did he shoot your dog or something?”

-TCobb1911

“I think we get the point, dude. It was an accident. Why not comment with this amount of tenacity when the facts are right?”

“Sigh – Always someone.”

-dtpollitt

“hm. there’s something to be said about wanting to be completely accurate in everything you do, but generally, when people notice small mistakes or lapses in logic, they tend to let it go. you’re reading a baseball discussion forum man, not a freaking dissertation for a PhD. Let it go.”

-ThisIsResolute

I just think the responses to Lowitzki’s post yesterday and Al’s post today are quite interesting in their differences.

Well I'll agree with you on that.

The attack dog routine has gotten a little old.

I think its the nature of blogs

Its much harder to calm things down once they get started and it starts to look like a chorus, all attacking the same person. If we were all in the same room it would be much easier to calm things down. I think the trick is to not let it get to you & try to not get involved.
 
NONE OF THIS IS PERSONALLY AIMED AT SACKINGS108

And the fact that I need to put that illustrates my point

Nah, it's not you Stan.

There are just certain people who will jump on anyone who dares disagree w/ Al. I think Al can defend himself just fine, but instead of being able to have a disagreement w/ Al, you have to answer to Sue, Kinky, et al. It’s stupid.

Name calling is also stupid

and you do that quite often.

Yeah, I did it once. Pleace demonstrate "quite often"
You called someone a bum

and said “you must be an idiot” to somone else. SouthsideCubsfan asked you yesterday to stop the name calling.

It’s not just the name calling. I don’t know if you realize how snarky you come across. Comments like. “can you pass what your smoking” and today you had a reply to Lowitzki that started out fine but you had to end it with “get over it”. Others on here have called you out on your snarkiness. I know you are very young and probably think it’s funny or cool but it’s not.

Since you can't back up your point,

you seem to like to refer to me as very young, as if that somehow proves something. Yeah, I’m 18, and you may be very old. That has nothing to do with anything. The fact is, your replies are often just as snarky as you claim mine are. You also choose to cherry pick things to prove your point. Yesterday, I did refer to cubswynn as an idiot, after he called me a “debbie downer.” I though it was stupid of him to say that, but also immediately responded to SSCubsfan criticism of me calling cubswynn an idiot, and admitted I was in the wrong. Beyond that, I haven’t called anyone any names. But you seem loathe to actually discuss real things, instead you decide to marginalize arguments by saying that I must think its cool to be snarky because I’m young.

Good point Sue. Makes plenty of sense. The fact is, you hate when people disagree with you. I referred to Kosuke Fukudome as “Fuku” the other day, and you had a fit about it, and decided you would “call me out on it” from here on out. Why? Because apparently you have nothing better to do than worry about the nicknames I use for Cub players. You’re just as snarky as I ever have been.

And thanks for demonstrating how I name call “quite often.” Excellent job of proving your point.

cmon, guys

wouldn’t you rather add to the growing legion of Milton stories instead of this? :D

+1

Such a hustler.

we're where the action is AT!
And another thing

I HATE THE WORD SNARKY!

Was I the only

one who asked you not call Dome that? I think there were others who asked you not to call him that too were there not?

You also called someone a bum when you got into it with preacherman so it was more than once.

I get along with most people on this board. I stay away from the “who should play ss” stuff because I get tired of all of that argument. If that to you means I loathe actually discussing “real” things so be it.

There were others who said it was wrong for me to say "Fuku"

but I was talking to you right now. Please explain to me how “quite often” means the same thing as “twice” because I must’ve missed that day in class.

Oh, and poop.

Again

my question is why you drag me into this. I didn’t participate in any of these conversations.

I was wrong for that.

I just remembered you from a previous argument, but shouldn’t have put your name in there.

Okay...

I appreciate that.

You called names

twice in the last two days. That’s enough. No name calling is one of the rules on this board and you apologized for it.

What’s wrong with saying poop when things don’t go well? It’s better than saying something else. You do realize that othe people on here say that too?

So then why do you keep bringing it up, if I apologized for it?
Because you called me

out in a post above to Stan.

Yeah, about how you jump all over anyone who disagrees w/ Al.

Like a few posts below. when you told tal to leave after he made a valid post, free of any snark.

All of the nit picky crap

posted towards Al lately has gotten very old. He works his butt off in here besides working a full time job and raising a family. I appreciate every thing he does in here and hate when people only come in here only to criticize his efforts. He has admitted he makes mistakes and is usually very cordial when they are brought to his attention.

I don’t defend him that often(he does a fine job by himself) but the last couple of months it’s been ridiculous.

Oh nice

dragging me into this? The only time I have a problem with someone disagreeing with someone else is when I share that same opinion. I have no clue which friggin conversation you are even bitching about but try dragging someone who was ACTUALLY involved into your drama…not me.

The attack dog routine........

…..never gets old!

If you look closely....

you can see Michael Vick in the background doing some scouting.

LOL

Leave Michael alone!

If little things

like that bothered me as much as it seems to be bothering you I’d just quit visiting the site.

just

proving the point. Right there.

Is it not true?
No it isn't true. If somebody doesn't like something, they have every right to say it,

and tal was being completely civil about it. You’re a complete hypocrite, Sue. Calling me snarky, and then saying this:

If little things like that bothered me as much as it seems to be bothering you I’d just quit visiting the site.

No it is true.

If you disagree that’s fine.

sue you don't need to defend me....

….bc hontestly the name calling thing doesn’t bother me….it truly doesn’t, but others do, so i don’t do it

i’m embarrassed to be apart of this discussion and although i want to defend myself, i won’t

can’t you just let it go sackings, i have

The homerun by Ransom was off Jeff Fulchino

Billy Traber, former Loyola Marymount Lion, is on the Yankees.

A delicious bit of irony.

I hope you correct this in your article, Al! =)

LOL

I will. I must have misread the PBP.

Sure, if this wasn’t the Internet.

Yeah, you’re probably right.

Damn

We need a game….

No doubt about it.
Crew and Stros at 7.

That’s something.

Thw Brewers-Astros game

is on ESPN tonight. That should be interesting, as the Stros have been playing really well this past week.

Anyone want to do a game thread?
I'm actually spending this particular off-night

shopping for clothes (pants, mutter) and watching National Geographic videos with my kid.

sounds like a fun night.

I’ll be watching the Olympics

My DVR is at 85%

I’ve been too busy watching Cubs games to catch up on other programing.

Did you see Cecil Cooper predicted the 'Stros would sweep the Brewers?

http://houston.astros.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20080817&content_id=3326867&vkey=news_hou&fext=.jsp&c_id=hou

I'd buy that for a dollar.
Great. Bulletin board material.

Maybe it’ll get in the Brewers’ heads, though.

OT

Kyle Orton named Bears starting QB. Like that’s gonna help them..:)

poor Orton....

I don’t envy anyone tasked with standing behind that O-Line…

I suggest long snapping to Hester on every play and just letting him run for it.

I feel bad for Kyle.

If they had a better offensive line he might do ok.

And so would Grossman.

I predict at least half the games will be QBd by more than one player.

us packer fans don't have such a problem...
snort! snicker...

er, ahahah.

Heh.

that’s right! Good luck to you, sir packer fan! :D

well, I'm more optimistic about Aaron Rodgers than any of you seem to be about

your two headed monster, but I guess that’s because of their repeated failure.

Can we use our two-headed monster concurrently?
Drew, I'll bet you $20 the Packers have a better record than the Bears this year

WIth the winnings going to Project 3000

I think the Vikings take both of us this year.
That is possible . . .
alright, I'll take that bet

When do we check? Jan 15 2009?

I was thinking regular season.

If by some ridiculous quirk, they both make the playoffs, we can make another bet.

How about — regular season records. If they tie, we go to head to head. If that’s tied, we go to total points. If that’s tied, well, it’s not going to be, so let’s just say if it is we both lose!

Going to the Convention?

We could give the payment to Al…

I would LOVE to go to the convention this year.

So we could definitely meet up there. There should be a BCB convention meetup anyway.

Sounds like a plan.

We’ve got a brew-stro thread going btw

I don't dislike this.

Grossman’s a better passer…if he’s facing a defense of one. This makes me feel a little better.

Just glad the Bears didn't name DeRo as their starting QB :-)
Speaking of awesomely researched articles....

Check out this Randy Hill gem from FoxSports

It features such insights as:

(With regard to batting order):

The third hole can be occupied by first-year Cub Kosuke Fukudome

Where he has exactly zero ABs this season. But that’s okay because

Jim Edmonds, the former St. Louis Cardinal who hit miserably during an early run as a San Diego Padre, can hit third now….

Where he has been slotted for exactly one game this season (not sure if it was with the Cubs or the Fathers). Speaking of Jimmy Baseball

if the Cubs are hitting against a southpaw that might give Edmonds trouble (not likely, based on history)

Huh? Against LHP, who are not likely to give him trouble, Jimmy’s batting a robust .167/.222/.262

But we’re lucky that we have:

super-sub Mike Fontenot, who….has enough glove skill to play several different positions.

Good to have, as Lou’s been able to slot him in this season in an array of positions, including and limited to second base and pinch hitter.

…And on it goes… Not that I mind some positive press, but could you at least watch the team that you are writing about? Sheesh…

wow.

talk about mistakes; this guy’s a blue-light special.

Addendum:

The one game that Edmonds played, batting third was this past Saturday against the Marlins. Didn’t realize that when I wrote the above.

So maybe Randy Hill watched part of 1 game before writing his article.

What...

no mention of Rich Hill in our starting rotation? :)

No...

He’s busy backing up Fonzie in left. He’s the left handed power bat that Lou’s been looking for.

Well

Rich Hill making a comeback as an outfielder has been suggested. :)

(please note: I only post that because it is directly responsive to bobby’s post, I’m not a hapless shill!)

Off Day Activities

I am going to make use of my off day by going to double feature of VERY rare French crime thrillers ( films of course) from 1947 and 56. I am a huge film buff but hardly see much during the season ( I like mostly old stuff) . The last off day I went swimming in the lake as I was in Chicago.
Hope the rest of you find some pleasant activity ( besides watching the Astros/Brewers). We should get some rest just like the players.

"see " you all tomorrow.

Did you see the French film Irreversible?
i got so much work done today...

…i wonder if people noticed this only happens on off-days?!? let’s go astros!

I Know It's An Off Day But.............

Astros /Brewers thread happening tonight?
Well, at the bottom of the first inning

ESPN2 listed the score billboard as Astros and CUBS!

Wonder what the brew crew nation thinks of that.

I'd hang around for a bit.
1-0 Brewers
after 2 out and no one on. ugh
listening in on gameday audio here, I'm in Dallas on business
I live in WI, so I could let you know in advance, if you want
sure thanks, just bored to death in my hotel room here, I hate off days
Alright, Wolf up with a runner on 2nd, 2 out
me too
Emelie! Well, now I HAVE to stick around for a little while.

;-)

awww... thanks :D
are you travelling?
yep in San Diego until Wed. morning

the air here smells like flowers.

How'd the presentation go?

I’m glad I’m not in Shanghai right now. Hotter than hell, and the air smells like, well, it just smells.

lol

presentation tomorrow afternoon. Of course I’m slotted as the last session of the last day, but it should still be good.

I would never expect Shanghai to smell like San Diego… lol!

It has it's moments

But they don’t come in July or August.

Good luck on the presentation!

thanks! I'm looking forward to it.
What is the topic?

Or would you have to kill me?

Digital Natives vs. Digital Immigrants

on the difference between those who are "Born Digital" (computers in the home from time of birth) vs. those who weren’t, i.e., Digital Natives vs. Digital Immigrants. Impact on the workplace and how we need to rethink how we conceive and deliver content so it becomes more engaging and interactive.

Cool!

There is a huge disparity, as you know better than I do.

My sister had a laptop PC that the computer shop couldn’t fix, and my then 8-year old nephew insisted on trying to fix it. She made him do it outside because she didn’t want him making a mess in the house . . . he took it apart, put it back together . . . and it worked.

not that it's programming

but it’s a similar point

excellent example

that sums it in a nutshell

Hey Emelie

Re-trying my Q from last time:

The divisions between Natives and Immigrants. I’d assume age is a large determining factor, correct? If so, is there a well defined line of demarcation?

age is the demarcation

it starts from the advent of Pong in 1974. So if you remember Pong, played it in your youth (13 or younger), you’d be the bleeding edge of Digital Natives.

Pong

sorry, was of negative age at time. =)

It’s certainly a relevant topic for BCB! In fact, BCB may well be a good laboratory for such a study, given the age distributions here.

Hey—you’re not secretly taking notes on us, now….

I'll bet she is

She seems quite the socialogical guru . . .

If so,

I demand a presentation!

join us on the fan post thread

link at the bottom

hire me and I'll give you all the news that's fit to print
damn.

I was going to ask YOU for a job!

Hey, I need a job too.

uh oh. Bunch of unemployed people talking to each other.

figures, since we have so much time to spend on the blog. =)

Not unemployed, at least not yet!

Hey, I can hire you if you have engineering experience. But the job is in Shanghai, and I can’t pay much…

I'm a consultant. not unemployed. lol!
I'm a grad student

so I’m paying to be unemployed, at least before I find financial support! =)

I'm considering becoming a grad student
In what?
considering going after an MBA

It’s a long, winding road…

Ah. That degree seems like a good

risk/reward thing, at least to me.,

Yeah, it's just figuring out what to do when I grow up, I suppose.

EE was my undergrad major, btw.

nice.

Wisconsin has a good EE program. Big Ten (Mich., Illinois) has some good ones.

you are, then, quite the native :D
Wolf strikes out to end the Houston 2nd.

1-0

Woman with really big hair in the seats
Cameron fans to start the home 2nd
Kendall pops to Tejada; 2 out

Still there, alabebo?

yep just on the phone
ah, ok. then I'll stick around for a bit more
Good for Maddux

Maybe now he can get those two wins to pass Roger ‘The Needle’ Clemens on the all time win list

What happened?
Maddux traded to Dodgers...
Ah, was wondering if that's what that was about

Nothing on ESPN.com yet

Acquired by the Dodgers

for a PTBNL.

Sabathia called out on strikes to end the 2nd.

Alright, looks like I’m talking to myself. I’m sure MCF will stop by and read this, then give me crap later. Good night, all.

Brewer VP of communications looks like Jeff Daniels
the NSA is always watching!
don't go away
what's up
quiet here in LA

gonna put the game on as soon as another program is over

alrighty.

I’ll stick around for another inning or two, anyway

I just put the game on too.

Will have to leave the office soon. The dogs are waiting for me!

what're their names? and what kind?
border collies
Is that the name or breed?

;-)

breed

I was going to lie and say their names were Aramis and Derrek.

Names are “shep” & “tell”…the breeder named them.

I love collies

spent a part of my childhood in farmland NY state. Lots of collies. Great dogs. We had a bulldog named Midge and a mongrel named Zilla (after Godzilla). I’m still a cat gal, for better or for worse, as you all know.

I was never a cat fan

but the older border collie (3 yrs) acts more like a cat. He loves to be petted and cuddled. I think he was ignored too much when he was young. We did not get him until he was 18 mos old.

Erstand strikes out to start the 3rd
Tejada flies to center
logging off for a bit be back soon
Berkman grounds to short

1-0 mid 3

Not a great pic to compare, but:

Brewer VP of communications, Tyler Barnes:

Jeff Daniels:

guitar guy's a lot cuter
The Brewer guy slimmed down a bit since that pic was taken
Ray Durham leads off the home 3rd

and strikes out swinging

Good news on the injury front..

I hear Rickie Weeks is day-to-day with his thumb owie

Not sure if they're worse with Weeks or Durham

Except Durham hits a little.

I prefer the Crew lineup

with 4 regulars under .250

Get Weeks back in there before Ned figures out that he has a ballplayer on his bench

Yeah, I'll buy that
Hardy lines out to short
OT: Rays lead Angels 5-2 top of 6th...

Quite a series here in Tampa….

That does sound like a good matchup
Too bad no one is watching in person....

…the attendance here is pathetic. I hope the Rays are in the WS against the Cubs….

1) it will be fun to pack the Trop with Cub fans.

2) it will be the only way I get to see WS games in person.

Yeah, I wonder what would happen

Would the “fanbase” sell their tickets for the Series?

There aren't that many season ticket holders...

…but the few fans they have are pretty loyal. Still, I don’t see it being a tough ticket…they have whole sections of seats in the upper deck of the dome that they cover for the regular season.

I imagine if demand required it they will open those seats and sell them to whoever wants them.

Well, that could get interesting

I’ll bet a lot of Cubs fans would travel south.

Also a ton of midwest retirees here...

…that I imagine will be ecstatic to see one Cubs WS game before they go….

…they don’t call it “God’s waiting room” for nothing! ;-)

Braun caught looking to end the 3rd
Brewers have 1 run on 1 hit, Houston 0 runs on 4 hits

CC with 4 strikeouts, Wolf with 5

Since you can't argue balls and strikes

or you get ejected, I always wonder what those conversations are like when the batter is jawing with the ump, like Braun just did after his strikeout.

You can argue, but you've got to be very careful

About what you say and your body language

One key hit

and Charlie Cheeseburger could be beat tonight.

Can the ’Stros build a threat?

Wigginton grounds to 3rd
I just realized I'm listening to Joe Morgan

my ears.

I'm falling behind on PBP

Blum grounds to 3rd.

Pence grounds to short

Two hard hit balls, but no runners. Mid 4, 1-0.

Sabathia

is too good. The only hope is to get into that awful Brewer bullpen.

My great uncle used to say

“A good pitcher like that has to lose once in a while.”

Take that for what you will…

sure hope that's the case tonight
Helluva trade for those guys.

They would be screwed without him. And I’ll still be shocked if Sheets makes it all the way to the end without being injured in some way.

He had a minor owie earlier in the year

But he’s still going.

Yeah, that was the right move. They gave up a lot, but they’ve got a narrow window. If they don’t win this year, they probably don’t get close for a couple of years – but you never know.

I just won't feel comfortable until the Cubs have a 10 game lead
I like what Al said a day or two ago

I’ll be comfortable when they clinch. Until the playoffs.

Yeah after last year the playoffs scare the hell out of me, what a collapse, but I think we're a better team for it this year
I do, too.

I think there is a determination to do better.

Of course, still gotta play.

Fielder hits a foul DEEP to left
Fielder walks

after being down 0-2

Hart singles sharply to center

1st and 2nd, 0 out

Hall flies to the track

Both runners move up. Great slide by Hart.

So we're discussing suds-stars here?

I’m stuck with the FSN WI announcers…I forgot how awful they were. Who’s doing ESPN?

U rah rah!

Emelie says Morgan. ESPN blocked out for me, too. You in the dorm?

nope, staying with my roommate

until dorms open sunday. Good to be back though!

roommate who lives in Madison
I love Madison in the summer.

Haven’t gotten there this summer yet.

yeah, I just arrived yesterday,

but it’s nice. I was working today so didn’t enjoy the weather, but I did get to get around Madison a bit, which was nice

Thorne & Sutcliffe?
Steve Phillips and I'm unsure of the PxP guy....
blacked out here, listening on gameday audio
Cameron flies to shallow right.

Kendall intentionally walked. Bases loaded for CC, 2 out.

oh dangit 3-0 brewers
Yeah, that's a HUGE momentum shift

Not a real good pitch, knowing that Sabathia can hit.

2-run single CC

3-0

maybe he'll get tired lugging his butt around the bases
Too bad

That could have been a momentum swing the other way, too

It's only bottom of the 4th there's hope
or maybe not... another run
Randy Wolf....

…yes, he was the missing link for an Astros’ run….and Ed Wade is an idiot.

Woof!

I believe it is Randy Woof. What a dog…

and that is an insult to my two boyz!!

SHOULD WE POST A THREAD?
I'll be there if we do
Launch a rally thread

for the enemy of my enemy, the Astros…

OT: Cliff Floyd 2-3 with a 2 run HR for Rays....

He’s been a great DH for them this year….

That's great news...I loved watching him play last year!
these guys have GOT to stop scoring!
the Packers didn't get this much against the 49ers...
Packers 6, Texans 0
Anybody watch the last season of THE WIRE?

For some reason I’m reminded of it in this post.

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Bleed Cubbie Blue to post a comment.