Cubs Again Rained Out Against Pirates

by Al Yellon on Oct 2, 2009 7:30 AM CDT in Chicago Cubs Recaps

Maybe the Cubs should forget about the fancy weather service to which they subscribe and just listen to third base coach Mike Quade:

"It doesn't look good on the radar," manager Lou Piniella said beforehand. "(Third base coach) Mike Quade does a good job with radars, and this thing is socked in pretty good."

Had they simply observed conditions, though, they could have played five innings last night and avoided the full refunds they're going to have to give anyone who had bought a ticket for last night's rainout. It rained yesterday starting about 3:30 in the afternoon, and continued until about 6:15, at which time it let up, they pulled the tarp off the field, and began play on time. A light mist was falling, and gusty winds started to kick up, which made Lou's professed desire to see Jeff Samardzija pitch one more time this year rather useless. Samardzija gave up three runs in the first inning, but Lastings Milledge's two-run homer would have been a routine fly ball on most nights at Wrigley; the howling breeze blew Milledge's ball into the first row of the left-field bleachers.

When the rain got harder the umpires held up play. What you don't know and may not have seen on TV, if you were watching, was that the hard rain lasted about five minutes and then let up again for about half an hour -- during which time they could probably have played through the fifth inning and avoided all the refunds.

About 8,000 people showed up last night in the conditions reminiscent of the last time the Pirates were in town -- a hard rain for a few minutes, then enough time to play. The postponement was the fifth of the season for the Cubs, the most since 1986. This one, obviously, will be cancelled and not made up.

Why did the Cubs wait nearly 2 1/2 hours before finally calling the game? Look at it this way. According to Biz of Baseball, the average ticket price for Cubs games in 2009 is $47.75 (third highest in the major leagues behind the Yankees and Red Sox, incidentally). Assume that approximately 33,000 tickets were sold for last night's game -- a fairly safe assumption, since that was the announced paid attendance for Wednesday night's game. That would make the gross ticket revenue from Thursday night (approximately) $1,575,750. That ticket revenue alone would be nearly enough to cover Aaron Heilman's $1,625,000 contract (number from Cot's Baseball Contracts). Now they'll have to refund all that money and pay Heilman some other way.

I kid. A little. Years ago, on a day like yesterday, even without modern "Super Doppler Radar", management would have called the game three hours before game time and not even opened the doors. There's too much money involved now to do that, for better or for worse. The forecast for today and tomorrow isn't much better. Seems somehow an appropriate way to end this drip of a season. Today's pregame thread will be up at 11:30 am CDT.

0 recs | 122 comments

Comments

Sounds like a miserable evening to be in the bleachers

eths - October 2, 2009 reply

Yes, it was.

The rain wasn’t really that bad. It was the wind that made it tough.

Al Yellon - October 2, 2009 reply

That blows!

Zeke - October 2, 2009 reply

LOL

Yes, it did!

Al Yellon - October 2, 2009 reply

Since it was a game with the pirates,

well blow me down! seems appropriate

katie casey - October 2, 2009 reply

You're saber has bested me, 'matey. Arrgh...

Zeke - October 2, 2009 reply

Sadly, it DOES seem like the last couple of days that the season is going out with a whimper...

rather than ending on a strong note. But let’s remember what the team play was the week BEFORE that. It was pretty good folks. So let’s not let a couple of days derail the better feeling we got since a certain right fielder was asked to stay home.

Zeke - October 2, 2009 reply

the last two weeks have been the season in a nutshell

play really well for a couple of days, and then bottom out for a couple. No consistency at all. FIRE THE EFFING MANAGER!

Nunyabidness - October 2, 2009 reply

Dang-does that mean they can't have that winning decade?

katie casey - October 2, 2009 reply

Best they can do is go .500 for the Naughties

If they play and win all 3 games vs. Arizona.

Clutch16 - October 2, 2009 reply

Even so...

A decade with 3 first place finishes is better than any of the past several decades. We’d have to go back to the 1930s (’32, ’35, ’38) to match that.

ChipSet - October 2, 2009 reply

I did watch the rain delay game

from Sept. 18, 2008. That was fun. During the time I was watching I kept saying to myself that’s back when the cubs were really good. I don’t ever want to say that again, let’s make better memories next summer.

mrcubsfan - October 2, 2009 reply

I couldn't watch that.

I was afraid it would hurt too much to see the difference between last year and this year. Too soon for me. I was still hoping for that miracle until a couple days ago.

katie casey - October 2, 2009 reply

I left the park when it started raining really hard.

So I saw some of that rain delay game too. What struck me most was one shot into the dugout where it showed Lou — a lot thinner than he is now — laughing out loud with someone on the bench.

I’d like to see the laughter back, as well as better play.

Al Yellon - October 2, 2009 reply

Coincidence

because I saw the same thing and thought the same. Winning is fun. Playing well is fun. Pitching well is fun. Hitting well is fun. 2008 was a fun year.

mrcubsfan - October 2, 2009 reply

Al, once the game starts, it's up to the umpires.

When the rain got harder the umpires held up play. What you don’t know and may not have seen on TV, if you were watching, was that the hard rain lasted about five minutes and then let up again for about half an hour — during which time they could probably have played through the fifth inning and avoided all the refunds.

And they aren’t charged with getting the Cubs revenue, they are responsible for maintaining safety.

Bleed Cubbie Blue