Last week in the discussion of the signs on the Waveland building rooftop, I posted this photo from June 22, 1953 which I believed to be the earliest available color photo of the scoreboard.
That prompted Bill Wasik, who provided the answer to the Waveland mystery, to send me this photo, taken even earlier. After the jump find out when it was taken, and which players are in the photo.

Photo courtesy Bill Wasik. Click on photo to open a larger version in a new browser window.

This is a rough composite of two 35mm slides taken with a stereo camera on Sunday, May 14, 1950. Pittsburgh was in town for a doubleheader, with Johnny Schmitz facing the Pirates' Junior Walsh. As we can infer from the scoreboard data and the position of the fielders, Wayne Terwilliger must be stepping in to the batter's box to lead off for the Cubs in the bottom of the first.
Players visible include Tom Saffell in center, Pete Castiglione at short, and the legendary Nanny Fernandez at third. The man in black on the third base line is Hall of Fame ump Al Barlick. Not seen but present are, surprisingly, Honus Wagner, who was still a bench coach for the Pirates in 1950 and, over in left field, Ralph Kiner. Ironically, Kiner was the player most active in lobbying the league to have Wrigley's centerfield bleachers closed in 1952.
Kiner came to the Cubs in 1953 -- after several CF bleacher sections had finally been closed from lobbying by him, as well as several members of the Cardinals including their manager, Eddie Stanky. The first game for which those sections were closed was a game vs. the Cardinals on April 20, 1952; on April 27 the Cubs announced they would be closed for "the rest of the year", but no one sat in those sections (which now is the batters' eye lounge/skybox) after that, except during the 1962 All-Star Game.
This is one of the only photos I have seen -- and the only one in color -- that shows the bleachers full, and people sitting in those CF seats. Attendance that Sunday, which, as Bill noted, was a doubleheader, was 34,659 -- and the Cubs, who were awful in 1950 (64-89), got swept by the even worse Pirates (who finished last at 57-96), 6-5 and 16-9.
A few other things of note in the photo:
0 recs | 31 comments
Same picture today
you would see fans wearing cubs jerseys and hats. Times have changed. I really like the view of a full bleacher. What were bleacher seats then? 50 cents?
mrcubsfan - November 30, 2009
The 1950 scorecard I have in my collection
… says bleachers were 60 cents. Grandstand was $1.25, box seats $2.50. Also says all games — doubleheaders or not — started at 1:30.
The card was from an August series vs. the Braves. It has a small ad for Bears tickets. You could buy a Bears season ticket in the box seats in 1950 (six home games) for $24.
Al Yellon - November 30, 2009
60 cents
times have really changed!
mrcubsfan - November 30, 2009
Even if I had Season Tickets for the Bears this year at $24
I’d still be asking for a refund.
Goodie1969 - November 30, 2009
Nah, at least the game vs. the Steelers was worth that much :)
DrGalazkiewicz - December 2, 2009
The only billboard is for Baby Ruth candy bars
WGN first started broadcasting Cubs games in 1948, so that was one forward thinking company. The Curtiss Candy Company, lore has it, claimed to name Baby Ruth after Grover Cleveland’s daughter, but REALLY wanted to tie the candy in with Babe Ruth without having to pay him royalties.
Emelie - November 30, 2009
Cool stuff
I don’t know what the average hourly wage was in 1950, but I remember my Dad telling me that when I was born in ’58 he was making $1.50 an hour working as a diesel locomotive mechanic for the Rock Island RR. If I have time I will do a wage/cost comparison of Wrigley tickets from 1950 compared to today.
BigJohnAZ - November 30, 2009
coach
Do we know who the 3rd base coach is?
KedzieKid - November 30, 2009
The Cubs...
… had three coaches in 1950, in addition to manager Frank Frisch.
Bill Baker, Spud Davis and Roy Johnson were the coaches. In those days, managers often coached third base. It might have been Frisch.
Al Yellon - November 30, 2009
Great Photo
Thanks!
Ihatethecards - November 30, 2009
Fun to see these old photos!
Really shows how simple and pure the game was back then (no exploding scoreboards, and no merry-go-rounds etc.
CubFanSince1970 - November 30, 2009
I hope we keep it that way
…looking at all these old pictures, I really appreciate even more that Wrigley hasn’t changed that much. IMO, you can change the name but I dont think I want a Jumbotron……the word gives me the shivers.
cooliogirl47 - November 30, 2009
+1
eths - November 30, 2009 via mobile
Awesome!
I wish my dad were still around to see that picture.
dvdmgsr - November 30, 2009
Weather
Also, it looks like Chicago had a cold March/April in 1950:
http://home.att.net/~chicago_climo/CHI1950.gif
I wouldn’t be surprised to see the ivy looking a bit peaked on May 14 that year.
dvdmgsr - November 30, 2009
Thanks for that chart.
As you can see, there was no ivy at all on some of the wall — it hadn’t grown that much by then.
Al Yellon - November 30, 2009
I've never seen so much "brick" in the "brick n ivy"....
….great pic.
carmen_fanzone - November 30, 2009
+1
The one thing I miss about Wrigley is the old bat racks in front of the dugouts. I don’t remember any of the other old stadiums that had that.
BigJohnAZ - December 1, 2009
a little bit of snow at the end of April too
cooliogirl47 - November 30, 2009
Boy, if the groundskeepers
Couldn’t repair damage done by football in time for the next baseball season…. I assume the erector-set football bleachers were built over the standing bleachers too, so that would have chewed up RF.
Didn’t anybody care about the condition of the field? Obviously, P.K. Wrigley didn’t care about the team, as we all-too-well know.
San Diego Smooth Jazz Man - November 30, 2009
What? Buy new sod?
Old man Wrigley would have never done that. The most he probably had his groundskeepers do was spread some seed around. lol
BigJohnAZ - December 1, 2009
Although...
… that photo from the Tribune, which we now DO know was from 1962, shows them laying new sod.
Al Yellon - December 1, 2009
I love these old pictures
rlpete - November 30, 2009
I hope to have more of them often during the winter.
Al Yellon - December 1, 2009
Flirting with darkness
If game 1 started at 1:30 in late April would really be dark toward the end of second game (presuming it started around 4 and that’s early, altho games shorter in those days).
I was always under impression scheduled traditional DH’s started at noon but obviously the clock in CF says otherwise. Interesting.
I’d never heard that Kiner and manager lobbied to close the CF bleachers. Now I’m wondering exactly how it looks today with the Batter’’s Eye area but that’s not directly where seating area was…may still be closed off closer to field.
QuincyCub - December 1, 2009
That photo was taken on May 14...
… after Daylight Saving time began, so sunset on that day would have been about 8 pm, plenty long enough to play a 2nd game starting even around 4:30.
I don’t know when they changed, but in the 1960’s doubleheaders started at 12:30. They moved DH back to noon starts sometime in the 1970’s.
Al Yellon - December 2, 2009
The reason for re-sodding in '62...
…may be found in the two big events scheduled for July of that otherwise dismal season: the “Telstar Game” on the 24th, and the All-Star Game on the 30th. It’s possible that NBC or the Commisioner’s Office picked up the tab for landscaping.
Also, the main reason for opening the full bleachers during the ASG may have been cosmetic. The empty centerfield sections had not been maintained for 10 years, and scenery that seemed only normal to Chicago viewers on Channel 9’s black and white telecasts likely was seen as a potential eyesore by network executives preparing a nationwide color broadcast.
Come to think of it, the poor condition of those bleachers may have been the reason for the otherwise inexplicable construction of the “Whitlow Fence” in ’63. Once Astroturf was invented a couple of years later, Wrigley had what he needed to cover that space.
ernaga - December 3, 2009
Was the "Telstar Game" already on the schedule by April?
Al Yellon - December 3, 2009
Probably not...
…there was no guarantee of a smooth satellite transmission to Europe that would allow scheduling that far in advance. However, the All-Star game had been scheduled at least since 1961 – reason enough to clean up the place.
ernaga - December 3, 2009
You're probably right about the ASG....
… although they could have also resodded DURING the season, rather than have the turf chewed up by 1/2 season of play. 47 years later, it’s hard to know for sure.
Al Yellon - December 3, 2009
I am fairly sure that there no geostationary satellites before 1963
With a perigee of c. 1000 km, an apogee 5000 or 6000 km, and inclination of between 40° and 50°, if I remember correctly, the Telstar satellites would have had an orbit time of roughly 2.5 hours. This means that probably not more than 30 or so minutes (best case) per orbit were available for a satellite link.
The first really useful, from a television point of view, satellite was Intelsat I (launched 1965?).
eths - December 3, 2009
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Bleed Cubbie Blue to post a comment.