January 5, 2011: The Texas Rangers signed Adrian Beltre as a free agent.
There is nothing odd about it. Boros is playing the various options against each other to get the best deal. I bet the number of serious teams at this point is very small. I wouldn’t be surprised if this is wrapped up in a few weeks.
So, to the extent that things change all the time, it isn’t weird, but this particular set of circumstances is different than other ones.
It does seem that the Rangers are interested only if they can’t sign Darvish. So, Team Fielder may be waiting until there’s some finality with that. Also, so many of the big market teams already have 1bmen in long term deals and aren’t a part of the bidding. It does seem like TheoJed aren’t going to “pay any price” to get Fielder. In addition, the potential Garza trade may impact who the Cubs have at 1b. It wouldn’t make sense for the Cubs to get both Rizzo and Fielder.
Based on all of that, I’m not surprised that the Fielder talks are still going on.
Well, for one, he had to wait for the market to settle after Pujols signed.
Now he’s got some sort of baseline, and the other big names are signed. He’s pretty much the only big fish left, so that’s good news for him and Boras.
Teams probably have “soft” offers on the table for amounts and lengths far lower than Boras is asking. He’s hoping somebody blinks first, which is why you’re seeing him more and more in the media.
There’s always updates if you search hard enough. There is nothing odd about the time this is taking – Boras always takes his time to get what he wants.
well, it's a bit more applicable in this situation than it was with Yu Darvish.
The bidding process for Darvish was pretty cut-n-dried. There were no “favorites” – there was only a winner, i.e. whoever bid the most.
But in normal free agency, I can see where “favorites” terminology could be used, especially if the player and/or agent are more forthcoming on their preferences or where they are in the process. For example, if Prince had come out and expressed a strong desire to NOT be a DH, wants to play for a team who trains in Florida (where he lives), and play in a dome, then once it became known which teams were in on him, it’d be easy enough to go through and establish a few favorites.
Sure it does, your dislike of this term is nonsensical
There are teams that are more likely to sign someone than others, therefore they are the favorites. There are teams that are more likely to win the World Series than others, so they are the favorites.
Favorites is a term that is used in sports all the time
Everyone thought the Yankees would be the favorites in the C.C. Sabathia sweepstakes a few years ago. I don’t recall him making public statements about his preference, yet the Yankees were the favorites.
Who’s been rumored to be in the PF sweepstakes? In no particular order, I can think of Rangers, Cubs, Mariners, Blue Jays, Cardinals, Brewers, Nationals, Orioles, Dodgers and Giants. That’s ten teams.
Out of that list, you wouldn’t say the Rangers and Nationals are favorites? Normally, I’d include the Cubs but the way TheoJed have been talking, it doesn’t seem likely. Hopefully, that’s just a smoke screen.
You could make a case for the Mariners being the favorite? Being able to outspend the Rangers or Nationals? Having a better chance of winning now and/or in the future than the Rangers or Nationals? Having more marketing/endorsement potential than the Rangers or Nationals?
If you can do that, you’re wasting your time here at SBNation. You should be writing for the NYTimes. Or Wall Street Journal (equal time…).
I'm thinking the offers are too soft, teams are lowballing what Fielder/Boras want
We know the personality of Fielder, and we know how Boras manages his clients, so it truly wouldn’t surprise me if teams were talking to him but aren’t making progress or budging their offers because honestly, Fielder could just end up being a massive crash in a couple to a few years. We all know Theo and Jed want to rebuild this organization from the ground up, so IMO, I think they’re trying to work out a deal to bring in Rizzo for the future, instead of Fielder for the present, but that’s just my opinion on the matter…
but where is a transcript of an interview that says TheoJed want us to go through a “complete rebuild?” I’ve seen Kenny Williams’ interview and heard him and Ventura backtrack after he initially said it, but never heard or read TheoJed say it’s “rebuild time” for the Cubs…
Boras didn't put together that binder for nothing.
He’s probably being really stubborn. Plus, I’d guess Prince’s contract will be one of the more complex ones in recent memory because of the body type concerns.
I also wonder if there is a team out there that’s talking to him that he would like to sign with that is trying to get something else done first.
Could that team be the Cubs?
For some reason the longer this goes the more hope I have we get him.
And does anyone remember a top free agent lasting until after the new year like this without there being extenuating circumstances?
puckishcubsfan - January 2, 2012
Andre Dawson?
timh815 - January 2, 2012
I didn't have to go too far.....
January 5, 2011: The Texas Rangers signed Adrian Beltre as a free agent.
There is nothing odd about it. Boros is playing the various options against each other to get the best deal. I bet the number of serious teams at this point is very small. I wouldn’t be surprised if this is wrapped up in a few weeks.
rlpete - January 2, 2012
Well
… it kind of has to be wrapped up “in a few weeks”, because we are now about six weeks away from players reporting to spring training.
I’d be surprised if it went beyond mid-January, about two weeks from now.
Al Yellon - January 2, 2012
The rules seem to change every year
So, to the extent that things change all the time, it isn’t weird, but this particular set of circumstances is different than other ones.
It does seem that the Rangers are interested only if they can’t sign Darvish. So, Team Fielder may be waiting until there’s some finality with that. Also, so many of the big market teams already have 1bmen in long term deals and aren’t a part of the bidding. It does seem like TheoJed aren’t going to “pay any price” to get Fielder. In addition, the potential Garza trade may impact who the Cubs have at 1b. It wouldn’t make sense for the Cubs to get both Rizzo and Fielder.
Based on all of that, I’m not surprised that the Fielder talks are still going on.
jerry morales rules - January 2, 2012
Well, for one, he had to wait for the market to settle after Pujols signed.
Now he’s got some sort of baseline, and the other big names are signed. He’s pretty much the only big fish left, so that’s good news for him and Boras.
dtpollitt - January 2, 2012
no
ballhawk - January 2, 2012
Boras is waiting on the Rangers
If they fail to sign Darvish, they could be expected to make an offer to Fielder.
cubzfan - January 2, 2012
Maybe Scott Boras was, you know, taking the holiday week off.
Kind of like most MLB front offices.
Al Yellon - January 2, 2012
Nope
elgato - January 2, 2012
No Pujols was a generational player, Fielder is a decade level player
there is legitimate fear his production will drop in 3 years
Ivy Walls - January 2, 2012
Wouldn't be surprised if the money isn't as high as Boras wants..........
….. and they’re waiting to see if some team or teams increase. Any team who would increase would be foolish. IMO.
BeerCub - January 2, 2012
I'm sure that's what's going on
Teams probably have “soft” offers on the table for amounts and lengths far lower than Boras is asking. He’s hoping somebody blinks first, which is why you’re seeing him more and more in the media.
Brett Taylor - January 2, 2012
I read that Fielder wants to play for the Cubs, but Theo/Jed may not want to sign him because they want the Cubs to go through a complete rebuild
That makes it even more odd if it’s true.
Chanman25 - January 2, 2012
Yeah, that was on MLBTR recently.
wrigleyrocker12 - January 2, 2012
Source?
MN exile - January 2, 2012
Newsday.
http://www.newsday.com/sports/baseball/insider-albert-pujols-showed-he-s-human-1.3421208
BucknerKongCardenal - January 2, 2012
except that does not make sense
signing Fielder and rebuilding are compatible
lookingdeadred - January 2, 2012
Theo and Jed have made it pretty clear that they don't exactly think so...
wrigleyrocker12 - January 2, 2012
They have?
lookingdeadred - January 2, 2012
From everything I've heard...
Yes.
wrigleyrocker12 - January 2, 2012
so really you are merely speculating
lookingdeadred - January 2, 2012
But does Fielder feel that way?
He may want to compete right away, not sit through a couple down years.
Dcr18 - January 2, 2012
true
lookingdeadred - January 2, 2012
There's not many options for him that involve competing right away.
He could make the Nats pretty dang good, but they’re in the best division in the NL.
wrigleyrocker12 - January 2, 2012
Nationals are apparently the new favorites...
There’s always updates if you search hard enough. There is nothing odd about the time this is taking – Boras always takes his time to get what he wants.
bdlugz - January 2, 2012
I wouldn't doubt if the Nationals aggresively pursued him
Signing him would put that team over the top.
Chanman25 - January 2, 2012
I really hate
… the terminology “favorites”, as if this were an election or horse race. It just doesn’t work that way.
Al Yellon - January 2, 2012
How about a Caucus!
RiskyBusiness - January 2, 2012
Please.....I've had enough
caucus stuff thrown at me to last a life time. I can’t wait for it to be over.
sue369 - January 2, 2012
At least he didn't say Straw Poll...
crackedcactus - January 2, 2012
Good thing you'll have it again in 4 more years.
Arbusto - January 3, 2012
I know. :(
sue369 - January 3, 2012
The headache officially begins today and lasts for 10 months.
I love politics, an very active in it but this just gives me a headache. And I think the nominees are a foregone conclusion to tell you the truth.
puckishcubsfan - January 3, 2012
And I think we need to stop the political discussion here.
Al Yellon - January 3, 2012
well, it's a bit more applicable in this situation than it was with Yu Darvish.
The bidding process for Darvish was pretty cut-n-dried. There were no “favorites” – there was only a winner, i.e. whoever bid the most.
But in normal free agency, I can see where “favorites” terminology could be used, especially if the player and/or agent are more forthcoming on their preferences or where they are in the process. For example, if Prince had come out and expressed a strong desire to NOT be a DH, wants to play for a team who trains in Florida (where he lives), and play in a dome, then once it became known which teams were in on him, it’d be easy enough to go through and establish a few favorites.
ballhawk - January 2, 2012
Maybe.
In this case, Boras and Fielder haven’t really said much at all.
Al Yellon - January 2, 2012
Sure it does, your dislike of this term is nonsensical
There are teams that are more likely to sign someone than others, therefore they are the favorites. There are teams that are more likely to win the World Series than others, so they are the favorites.
Favorites is a term that is used in sports all the time
Nunyabidness - January 2, 2012
Regarding winning a game or a series?
Sure.
For signing a player who has not made any public statements? Not so much.
Al Yellon - January 2, 2012
So.....between say, the Yankees and the Royals
when signing a top flight free agent, the Yankees wouldn’t be the favorites?
Really? it isn’t more likely that they’ll sign them?
Nunyabidness - January 2, 2012
Put it another way
Everyone thought the Yankees would be the favorites in the C.C. Sabathia sweepstakes a few years ago. I don’t recall him making public statements about his preference, yet the Yankees were the favorites.
Nunyabidness - January 2, 2012
C'mon.
Some situations, like that one, might be obvious.
This one, not so much.
Al Yellon - January 2, 2012
you sure about that?
Who’s been rumored to be in the PF sweepstakes? In no particular order, I can think of Rangers, Cubs, Mariners, Blue Jays, Cardinals, Brewers, Nationals, Orioles, Dodgers and Giants. That’s ten teams.
Out of that list, you wouldn’t say the Rangers and Nationals are favorites? Normally, I’d include the Cubs but the way TheoJed have been talking, it doesn’t seem likely. Hopefully, that’s just a smoke screen.
ballhawk - January 2, 2012
I have no idea.
Really. Out of the ten, if I really sat and thought about it, I could probably make a case for any of the 10 to be “favorites”.
Al Yellon - January 2, 2012
Really?
You could make a case for the Mariners being the favorite? Being able to outspend the Rangers or Nationals? Having a better chance of winning now and/or in the future than the Rangers or Nationals? Having more marketing/endorsement potential than the Rangers or Nationals?
If you can do that, you’re wasting your time here at SBNation. You should be writing for the NYTimes. Or Wall Street Journal (equal time…).
ballhawk - January 2, 2012
He didn't say "strong case."
Arbusto - January 3, 2012
Exactly.
A case? Yes. Which is why I don’t like these “favorite” articles.
Al Yellon - January 3, 2012
(shrugs shoulders and shakes head…)
ballhawk - January 3, 2012
Oh holy crap
Nunyabidness - January 3, 2012
neither did ballhawk
Cubbie-Tim - January 3, 2012
So what you're saying is that SOMETIMES you like the phrase, but this time you don't?
That’s slightly different than what you’ve been saying.
Nunyabidness - January 3, 2012
Hey!!
KEEP POLITICS OFF THIS BOARD!!!!
I kid… I kid.
fsuapollo - January 2, 2012
I don't think Scott Boras has great cell phone service
from his private island in the Caribbean. Once he gets back, it will move along.
RiskyBusiness - January 2, 2012
Pretty sure he has a sat phone for his island.
Right next to the bat phone.
crackedcactus - January 2, 2012
Not particularly
Not particularly
DTJchris - January 2, 2012
ISWYDT
ISWYDT and I highly rec it…
ballhawk - January 2, 2012
also rec'd
I also rec’d it.
Dcr18 - January 2, 2012
ditto
ditto
sue369 - January 2, 2012
can i rec it too?
Cubbie-Tim - January 2, 2012
No you can't.
No you can’t, only if you repeat your subject line in the body of your comment.
Dcr18 - January 2, 2012
can it be repeated and upside down
uʍop ǝpısdn puɐ pǝʇɐǝdǝɹ ǝq ʇı uɐɔ
Cubbie-Tim - January 3, 2012
I lol'd
I lol’d literally
LT - January 2, 2012
I'm thinking the offers are too soft, teams are lowballing what Fielder/Boras want
We know the personality of Fielder, and we know how Boras manages his clients, so it truly wouldn’t surprise me if teams were talking to him but aren’t making progress or budging their offers because honestly, Fielder could just end up being a massive crash in a couple to a few years. We all know Theo and Jed want to rebuild this organization from the ground up, so IMO, I think they’re trying to work out a deal to bring in Rizzo for the future, instead of Fielder for the present, but that’s just my opinion on the matter…
bmasson11 - January 2, 2012
Carlos Beltran also signed late (not this year but last time).
Of course like jerry-moralas-rules mentions above, the rules were different then.
And there seem to be rumors all the time, the Nationals being the latest.
BucknerKongCardenal - January 2, 2012
Maybe I've missed it...
but where is a transcript of an interview that says TheoJed want us to go through a “complete rebuild?” I’ve seen Kenny Williams’ interview and heard him and Ventura backtrack after he initially said it, but never heard or read TheoJed say it’s “rebuild time” for the Cubs…
jthack - January 3, 2012
Boras didn't put together that binder for nothing.
He’s probably being really stubborn. Plus, I’d guess Prince’s contract will be one of the more complex ones in recent memory because of the body type concerns.
daver - January 3, 2012
Anyone?? Anyone??
Hammer - January 3, 2012
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Bleed Cubbie Blue to post a comment.