SB Nation - Login for mobile commenting

Bleed Cubbie Blue

Cubs, Matt Garza Avoid Arbitration

Starting pitcher Matt Garza  of the Chicago Cubs looks up at Nationals Park in Washington, DC.  (Photo by Rob Carr/Getty Images)

Rob Carr - Getty Images

Starting pitcher Matt Garza of the Chicago Cubs looks up at Nationals Park in Washington, DC. (Photo by Rob Carr/Getty Images)

The Theo Epstein/Jed Hoyer era in Chicago begins with the team avoiding any arbitration hearings. The last unsigned player was Matt Garza, and this tweet from his agent gives the scoop on Garza's deal:

Matt Garza agrees to $9.5 Million contract + Performance Bonuses to avoid arbitration. #Cubs #MLB
Feb 03 via web Favorite Retweet Reply

The Cubs had offered $7.95 million and Garza had asked for $12.5 million; the midpoint of those was $10.225 million, so the settlement is somewhat less than that, although the unspecified "performance bonuses" could presumably make up the difference.

Just 15 days until pitchers and catchers report to Mesa to begin workouts.

0 recs  |  121 comments

Comments

Always makes me wonder . . .

. . . who blinked at the last minute, you know?

Glad to have this taken care of.

It's just about the midpoint

… so it sounds like a fair compromise.

What team will he have to play for, in order to get that post-season performance bonus?
Good Job Theo!

Always good to avoid Arb

i'd say its not "Always" good....
Works for me.

Now, let’s sign a Cuban outfielder and get to Mesa.

a couple of cuban outfielders please.

hey, just sayin.

I bet we get one, not both.
i bet we could get Fukudome for cheap
I see what you did there.

Not funny, Tim. :)

maybe the Yankees?

After Hendry gets them to pick up Soriano from us?

Sounds like Kosuke will be a Met or back in Japan.
A Met?

I had not heard that.

Boom.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/02/latest-on-mets-search-for-outfield-bat.html

Thanks.

Missed that.

No problem.

It sounds a tad speculative, but I stand by my original comments because, well, I’ve seen nothing else to indicate any other team is interested in Kosuke.

The only other team that makes some sense for him is the A's.

But I have not seen him specifically linked to them.

Do the A's need another OFer?

I know Oakland digs walks, but still …

Brace yourself - A's might be where Manny ends up

Makes very little sense, but then again, when’s the last time anything involving Manny made sense? In that concrete stadium, before a dwindling fan base, and probably sub-500 record, it might be the perfect place to just let Manny be Manny…

Of course, he couldn't play until almost June.
Its a Joke

MLB is letting him halve his suspension. He ran off and “retired” when he was caught. Now he comes back and he only has to serve half the suspension. What a joke.

plus he can play in the MInors

for part of it. I dont agree with that part of the drug suspension policy

Agreed...very much

Not enough teeth to the policy

When did Fukudome become an "outfield bat"

Never really carried his weight as a hitter.

im just trying to get him back for you

since you owe him a ride to the airport still

I think the greater BCB community ...

will be happier without the routine elgato rants about Kosuke, don’t you? :)

depends

if we sign him today, and can trade him minutes after re-introducing him at Wrigley to the Mets and you get to drive him as promised, then it wont be too much, and hopefully you have a good story about your driving him to the airport

cuz we all know how much you are hurting inside for not being able

to drive him when he was traded

Funny thing:

I don’t even own a car anymore.

pedi-cab?
Zipcar, probably.
I use Hourcar here in St. Paul

It’s a nice alternative. There are four within walking distance, they’re generally clean and well-kept, and it’s a monthly fee plus hourly/mileage based on use.

Now if only some of the other users could learn the basics of diagonal parking!

we have a similar thing here in Austin

Car2Go

Doesn't he play for the Rockies?

I think the greater BCB community

is far better off with less Koyie Hill rants than Dome rants. :)

I never really jumped on the anti-Koyie bandwagon.

I just didn’t care that much. He sucked, but he wasn’t a guy who precipitated a bunch of subsequent moves to dull the blunt of his failed contract. Koyie also didn’t get a litany of ridiculous excuses around here (though he got some).

You are right about the last sentence

I guess I was thinking more of my rants about Hill, BCB is better off with out it.

Plus starting OF who made 10’s of millions and sucked, normally would be things discussed on baseball website.

I doubt there has or ever will be as much time spent discussing a back up catcher.

but there was that one post a while back

it was a million words on Koyie, some great comments in it as well, wish i could remember the title to it.

Although this is good news

I would’ve rather seen “Cubs, Matt Garza Avoid Arbitration by Signing Extension”

That's my thought and what now?

Is Garza not in our long range plans? Is this a sign and trade just waiting for July? If not Garza who (for 2013 and beyond)? Would he not agree to anything more than one year? If he’s not in our plans past this season, what is the plan for TeamTheo going forward?

A lot of questions I know. But, I like having him back but curious to why we couldn’t get a longer extension.

Maybe sitting back and watching next years FA pitcher class

and the big name I’d keel over and die for if he made it to the north side, Mr. Josh Hamilton.

DO. NOT. WANT.
because he relapsed

and had some drinks recently or because how some people (not I) want to give him a parade and other bull crap for not doing heroine since he quit (so far)

FWIW I agree I too dont want

Anybody catch Quade's comments about Sveum in the Sun Times today????

Absolutely hilarious…He still does not get it…

No. Link?
I think this is what he's talking about.

Little league managing
Here...

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/baseball/cubs/10398317-573/mike-quade-takes-issue-with-dale-sveums-evaluation-of-cubs-effort.html

This man managed a major league team..

The further we get from this idiot’s reign, the better, but little things like this bring me right back to how he managed that team, and make me wonder how that even happened.

And then I remember that Jim Hendry was our GM.

And then I shiver and get a knot in my stomach.
Jim hired his buddy to manage......now they are not with the Cubs...

So thanks Jim?

but he was an All Star last year
...
"Maybe I’m being an ­idiot, but I thought we gave apretty damn good effort every night. I don’t know, maybe that was [Sveum’s] philosophy or a backhanded shot. I didn’t hear that.’’

The answer is…He’s being an idiot.

Idiot is a key word.....He must have been in the crapper everytime Soriano batted....

He already thought Soriano batting 40 points higher than he did.

"every night"?

I hate to say it…but it’s Wrigley Field. Wouldn’t “every game” be more appropriate than “every nite”? Exactly what team was Quade managing??? LOL

I cant handle the links....sorry...Thank you Easy Ed for posting it.
Quade

Was going to comment on this yesterday… Quade strikes me as a nice guy and a class act. The more he opens his mouth, the more I want to smack him. He seems to typify the concept of “when everyone but you is laughing, the joke’s on you…”. There is a reason that some guys are destined to be minor league managers and occasionally one of them gets promoted to the majors. It doesn’t take long to see that they are WAY over their head.

I just don't understand why he felt he had to say anything.

All he did was make himself look like, well, what he called himself.

Honestly, the interview lasted about a minute, based on the amount of quotes.

Quade probably picked up and didn’t think he should shut his mouth until 60 seconds in.

It was a humorous flashback to last year and the horridness of the Chicago Cubs

One of the worst run teams I have ever seen

Quade was really bad, no question.

But he was handed such a dud of a team. He got the sloppy seconds (or thirds) from the 2007-08 squads. It was largely a group of veterans that knew it wasn’t going anywhere by June 1 and kind of played that way (with some exceptions). I’m not sure another manager could have gotten much better results or effort — though I bet we would have seen more young guys. To me, that was the worst part about Mike Quade. That Bryan LaHair wasn’t up earlier was just ridiculous.

My guess for a while has been that Ricketts retained Hendry and Quade for 2011 figuring that a new management team would spend at least two years dealing with the leftover bad contracts from the Tribune era. So why not give Hendry/Quade one more shot to write the team’s wrongs — particularly after the strong finish in 2010?

Then, when it became clear how barren the farm system was and how dumb Quade was, Ricketts decided it was time for a massive overhaul.

The kids should have been playing daily from July on...the lazy vets...should have sat. They earned that spot....

But finally that is all over………..And what Dale said is spot on……Quade can get over it.

Perhaps...

… he’s trying to cement himself as the second coming of Jim Essian. The way Quade looks at it, you’d think that the Cubs won the division by 20 games. It was clear that there were numerous problems and everyone seems to get it but Quade. I guess you can say what’s the point of rehashing it all, but, IMO, Quade’s inability to do that is part of his bigger problem, wherein he buries his head in the sand and allows the inmates to run the asylum.

My guess is

… that Quade has had his last major league job. If he wants back in the game, it’ll likely be managing a Triple-A franchise somewhere.

He might get a coaching job in the majors.

But managing? Hell no.

is there such thing as a clapping coach?
There is "waving" - he could coach 3B again....
agreed
"i'm gonna have to have speaks with Sveumsie about this!"
I was laughing so hard at that

my boyfriend actually asked me what was so funny.

Thats probably what he really said...
And it proves my point about his managing completely...

No clue about controlling a team.

Good things

Another good thing with Garza’s signing. The Cubs are moving onward and upward. The future is theirs to win.

Dempster, Garza, Maholm, Wood, and Volstad sounds fairly decent.
Subtract Garza and add Wells

All signs point to Garza being traded by April 1st.

Look at the signs: a one-year arb deal instead of two. No extension.

This team is building itself up for the long haul, not just a win in 2014. I dont think Theo has any plans to start out this run by saddling himself with a five- year, $80-million contract for a #2 pitcher.

Garza is no ace. But he’s worth a future ace or two in trade, and I think that’s the goal here. Not a Chris Archer, but a bonafide ace prospect, and more. THEN we have a core to establish a winning future.

Matt Garza is the most valuable piece we have. Time to do this right.

All signs point to Garza being traded by April 1st.

Really now. What signs are those? I have not seen any.

Okay then

A few signs point vaguely in the direction of Garza maybe getting dealt by April 1 or July 31st.

If Garza was to remain with this team, yesterday would have been the announcement of an extension. If Garza was in next year’s plans or beyond, they would have at least given him a two-year deal.

It’s easy to get blinded by the hope that this team is going to make the playoffs this year and next. They might. But TheoJed has made it very clear that if a decision does not make sense in terms of the overall “build” for the future, they will not get bogged down by it.

I open the floor to anyone who can explain how an expensive extension to Garza fits in with anything else TheoJed have done so far. Myself, I have deduced from their words and actions that Garza is to be traded for outstanding, young talent. See “converting short-term assets into long-term assets”. We build a strong, affordable foundation. Big spending comes in phase two, a few years from now.

It takes two sides to make a deal...

You have no idea what Garza’s camp was pushing for. Maybe they didn’t want anything other than a 6+ year deal or a 1 year deal.

Assuming that they’d look at anything the Cubs offered ignores half of the equation.

Exactly.

And further, we don’t know if Theo & Jed might not offer an extension next week, or a month from now, or in midsummer. The fact that they signed a one-year arb deal implies exactly zero about the future. It’s an arb deal, period.

Do we know if he'll be offerd an extention no

but do we now know that if TheoJed get the right offer by the trade deadline, it will much easier to trade him. They left that door wide open. Smart move on Cubs part.

I LOVE BEING ABLE TO TYPE THAT LAST SENTENCE!!!!

Sure.

But giving him an extension might also be a smart move. By midseason TheoJed will have a much better idea of the team’s direction — which will tell them whether they should extend, or deal.

Doing it now, just for the sake of doing it, is pointless.

I'm not sure whether he'll be traded by April 1st...

…or July 31st. But it does feel to me like Garza could still be dealt.

The funny thing about the Garza situation is we’re kind of right back where we were a few years ago with Carlos Zambrano. That is, we have a solid No. 2 (which I used to argue Z was) but have no one to put over him. So I do have to wonder whether it’s worth signing Garza to a long-term deal.

Maybe it is as long as there’s enough room in the budget to still get a No. 1 next season if one of them becomes available. Or maybe it’s not if Theo/Jed/Jason think they can get the prospects they want in the near future.

One thing to note:

The speculation has been that Garza would get 5 year deal worth around $65 million, not a 5 year deal worth $91.5 million.

If this is true, it looks like the Cubs will pay their No. 2 starter like a No. 2 starter — and not like an ace. So, there’s a key distinction between Z five years ago and Garza now.

That's what John Danks got...

…and I have read him used as a good comp for Garza. So maybe Theo & Jed will try to do both. I’m guessing they’ll still wait and see what the market may conjure up leading into the season and at the deadline.

What's up with Sox fans still thinking Garza is going to be the Theo compensation?
i saw a fanpost on OTM saying that garza was fair compensation and laughed my ass off

and then i saw it was written by a rays fan and said “WTF!?”

I thought he was just a bozo Sox fan who lived in Tampa.

But you’re right.. his profile says Rays fan. Maybe it’s an elaborate troll, in which case it’s pretty awesome. However, on the off chance that it’s serious, we don’t claim him as one of our own. Yes, I can speak for all Rays fans.

Looks like a smart move

glad to hear no arbitration this year.

Matt Garza looks like a devil...

just sayin

I think he's trying to channel his inner "Rock"

if he can get that one eyebrow to go up a little higher, then he’ll be yelling “Can you smeeeeelllllllllllllllllllllllllll what the Garz is cooking!!!!!!!”

You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Bleed Cubbie Blue to post a comment.